Evander Holyfied: Beyond the Ring

Holyfield

In 1964, two-year-old Evander Holyfield relocated with his family from the mill town of Atmore, Alabama, to the city of Atlanta, Georgia. As the youngest of the family’s nine children, it is speculated that Evander learned early on to fight for his share of recognition. Whatever the motivation, Holyfield began boxing in earnest at age 12, and his unusual gifts for the sport quickly became apparent. By age 13, Holyfield had qualified to compete in his first Junior Olympics; by age 15, he had become the nation’s Southeastern Regional Champion.

In 1983, at age 20, Holyfield won a silver medal at the Pan Am Games in Caracas, Venezuela. And in 1984 — easily the most eventful year of his early career — he became the National Golden Gloves Champion, won a bronze medal at the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, and made the fateful decision to leave the amateur ranks and become a professional fighter.

By 1986, little more than two years after turning pro, Holyfield’s rapid ascendance in the cruiserweight division positioned him for a title shot against then-WBA Champion Dwight Muhammad Qawi. In a bout that Ring Magazine would deem “the best cruiserweight fight of the 1980s,” Holyfield won a hard-fought 15-round split decision, and his first world title.

The next two years saw Holyfield dominate the division: scoring a fourth-round knockout in his rematch with Qawi, and winning both the IBF and WBC cruiserweight titles — becoming the first-ever undisputed cruiserweight champion of the world. And in 1988, hungry for new challenges, Holyfield decided to move up in weight class to pursue the heavyweight title.

A series of devastating knockout victories over legitimate heavyweight contenders and former champions — most notably Michael Dokes, a fight that Ring Magazine dubbed “the best heavyweight bout of the 1980s” — quickly established Holyfield as the division’s #1 contender, and by 1990, positioned him for a title shot against then-heavyweight champion, Mike Tyson.

That fight would be delayed, however, and in October 1990, Holyfield would score a third-round knockout over James “Buster” Douglas — who had defeated Tyson months earlier — to become the undefeated, undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. In so doing, Holyfield notched the second of his historical “firsts”: becoming the first fighter to ever hold unified titles in the cruiserweight and heavyweight divisions.

Holyfield’s career would continue to span another twenty-odd hall-of-fame caliber years, and feature many of the sports most memorable battles — including three magnificent fights against Riddick Bowe, and two commanding victories over Mike Tyson. In the course of those years, Holyfield, arguably the sports fiercest and most courageous competitor, would become the first and only man in the history of boxing to recapture the heavyweight title four times.

Yet for all of his many accomplishments in the ring, and his long-time acquaintance with fame and celebrity, the greater portion of Holyfield’s life — his values, his faith, his passions beyond boxing; in short, in his inner world — remain largely unknown to the public.

EHolyfield

“…Beyond the Ring,” through its up-close perspective on Holyfield, and its focus on the Holyfield Foundation’s work with at-risk/disadvantaged youths, will allow us a glimpse into that inner world. A world comprised of a champion’s heart, a champion’s pride and a champion’s sense of discipline. A world inhabited by an extraordinary man, with an extraordinary sense of duty, and the courage to help lead others into manhood.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2011. (“Evander Holyfield: Beyond the Ring” is registered with the WGA West, Inc.)

In Search of Mos Def

Mos Def

In 1996, a single titled Universal Magnetic was released to much acclaim into New York’s hip-hop underground. And over time, the artist behind it — a 23-yr-old with the stage name “Mos Def” who had become familiar to the city’s hip-hop faithful through various collaborations and cameo appearances, most notably with the storied De La Soul — would steadily become one of the culture’s most sought-after talents.

Born Dante Smith in Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn, Mos demonstrated an early interest and aptitude for the arts — majoring in Musical Theater at New York’s Talent Unlimited High School of the Performing Arts, and notching roles in the TV movie God Bless the Child, and alongside Bill Cosby in the The Cosby Mysteries, while still a teenager.

In 1998, after signing with the now-defunct Rawkus Records, Mos Def, along with his partner, Talib Kweli, released the eponymous Mos Def & Talib Kweli are Black Star — an album that showcased their cultural literacy, their political awareness, their uncommon creativity and, by the standards of the era, made stars of them both.

One year later, Mos released his debut solo album Black on Both Sides, a masterpiece of hip-hop music — a masterpiece of American music — that captivated a generation of listeners and catapulted Mos Def into the ranks of superstardom.

Newer and ever more prominent outlets for his creative gifts soon followed.  In 2000, he landed a role in Spike Lee’s Bamboozled; 2001 saw him join Halle Berry and Billy-Bob Thornton in the controversial Monster’s Ball; in 2002, he starred alongside Taye Diggs and Sanaa Lathan in Brown Sugar, and opposite Jeffrey Wright in the Pulitzer Prize®-winning play Topdog/Underdog on Broadway; in 2003, he landed a role in the big-budget Hollywood feature The Italian Job.

2004 saw Mos sign to Interscope/Geffen Records, where, at the helm of his rock band Black Jack Johnson, he released his second solo album: the daringly experimental A New Danger — which notched several Grammy nominations. That year also saw Mos notch Emmy® and Golden Globe® Award nominations for his searing performance in the HBO film Something The Lord Made.

In the ensuing years, work in TV, film, theater and music has continued almost unabated — onscreen in The Woodsman with Kevin Bacon, 16 Blocks with Bruce Willis, Be Kind Rewind with Jack Black, and Cadillac Records with Beyoncé Knowles; in-studio with the release of True Magic and The Ecstatic; onstage in John Guare’s A Free Man of Color at Lincoln Center —  with Mos continuing to grow as an artist, and with his artistic and creative renown continuing to grow here in the States and around the world.

But even though much is known about the art that Mos Def’s gifts and versatility produces, little is known of the man — little is known of the artist — behind the art. In Search of Mos Def will both literally and figuratively seek to find the man and artist — searching through his life and loves to find the wellspring of his creativity; witnessing, first hand, the method of his expression; and learning, through his own words, the aims of his unique vision.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2011. (“In Search of Mos Def” is registered with the WGA West, Inc.)

In Search of Ms. Lauryn Hill

Lauryn Hill

In 1992, an aspiring young recording artist named Prakazrel Michel, approached Lauryn Hill, a gifted young poet/vocalist in his New Jersey high school, about joining a music group that he was forming with his cousin, Wyclef Jean. The trio — whose eclectic sound integrated elements of hip-hop, soul and Caribbean musical forms, and whose lyrics reflected a heightened political awareness — dubbed themselves “The Fugees” (as in refugees), and were soon signed to Columbia Records.

In 1994, the group released their first EP Blunted on Reality. While the album garnered little in the way of mainstream recognition, it notched two urban-market hits and revealed a bold new artistic voice — setting the stage for a much-anticipated follow-up.

That sophomore effort, 1996’s The Score, would exceed even the highest expectations — charting four Billboard hits, selling 15 million units worldwide, earning Best Rap Album and Best R&B Vocal Performance by a Duo or Group at the 1997 Grammy® Awards, and catapulting The Fugees into superstardom. The glare of fame and fortune, however, intensified problems within the group, and strained by the growing solo ambitions of its three members, The Fugees disbanded before year’s end.

In 1998, Lauryn Hill released The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill, and soon thereafter, she became the biggest solo artist in the world. Combining live instrumentation with Hill’s rich vocals and impassioned lyrics, Miseducation reigned atop the Billboard charts for six weeks — charting four hits (including a #1 single) and selling more than 18 million units worldwide.  At the 1999 Grammy® Awards, Miseducation earned Hill a permanent place in music history, making her the first woman ever to notch 10 nominations in a single year. Hill went on to win five Grammys® — Best R&B Album, Best R&B Song, Best Female R&B Vocal Performance, Best New Artist and Album of the Year — also a historical first.

As time progressed, Hill became disenchanted with the burdens of celebrity. Distancing herself from the music industry and the media — firing her management team, rejecting interview requests, refusing to watch TV or even listen to music (or so it is rumored) — Hill sought refuge in her then-burgeoning spirituality. And in 2000, near the height of her acclaim, Lauryn Hill vanished from the public eye.

Hill would resurface after more than a year — releasing a moderately popular second album, appearing (with occasional controversy) at several high-profile international events, and reuniting with The Fugees for a two-year span that ended bitterly in 2006.

In the years since, Hill has continued to tour and perform intermittently in venues around the world. Frequent domestic appearances during 2010, coupled with rumors emerging from within the music industry, have led many to speculate — some, perhaps, wishfully — that Hill intends to release a new album in the coming year.

How will the music world receive Lauryn Hill? Can her creative vision remain relevant in a ever-fragmenting pop-culture industry? Is she truly ready to face the glare of a celebrity spotlight that’s more intense and unrelenting than the one she fled? In Search of Ms. Lauryn Hill intends to document her journey and uncover the truth.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2010. (“In Search of Ms. Lauryn Hill” is registered with the WGA West, Inc.)

Finding Allen Iverson

Allen Iverson


In recent decades, as the popularity of basketball has grown and spread throughout the world, many standout players from the United States have explored offers to travel overseas and continue their careers as professional athletes. Of this ever-growing pool of talents, a select few have been former NBA players; fewer have been NBA players of any renown; and none have been as prominent as Allen Iverson.

One of the fiercest competitors and most prolific scorers in NBA history, Iverson entered the league as the #1 pick in the ’96 NBA Draft, and almost instantaneously established himself as one of basketball’s brightest stars and most captivating talents — winning Rookie of the Year honors and leading the Philadelphia 76ers’ return to prominence.

Underneath the brilliance of Iverson’s play, however, lay a complex, sometimes unpredictable personality that meshed uneasily with the corporate culture of the NBA  — bringing Iverson into frequent conflict with the head coaches for whom he’s played during his 14-year career. And in 2006, following a 10-year stint with the 76ers, during which he lead the team to six-straight Playoff appearances and an appearance in the NBA Finals, Iverson was traded to the Denver Nuggets — the first of three teams for which he would play during the next four tumultuous seasons.

In November 2009, just three weeks after the Memphis Grizzlies terminated his contract by “mutual agreement,” Iverson signed a one-year, non-guaranteed contract with the 76ers — hoping to end his career where it began. Three months later, citing family issues, Iverson left the team indefinitely. And in March of this year, the 76ers announced that Iverson would not return.

On the eve of the 2010 NBA Season, Allen Iverson — 11-time All-Star, seven-time All-NBA selection, four-time scoring champion, two-time All-Star Game MVP, and 2001 NBA MVP — found himself unsigned and uncertain of his future as a professional athlete, until inking a two-year deal with Besiktas of the Turkish Basketball League.

As he embarks on what may prove to be the final leg of his athletic career, Iverson — a baller and “streetwise” persona forged on the courts of Virginia; a world-renowned athlete who has triumphed at the highest levels of competition — becomes a stranger in a strange land, cast adrift from the fame and fortune of the NBA, and dreaming, some speculate, of someday returning.

What are Iverson’s plans for the future? What will be the key challenges he faces — how will he create a sense of normalcy — in a society so different from our own? What wisdom has he earned from his experiences? And what does he want to share with the world?

 “Finding Allen Iverson” will explore those questions and more, serving as Iverson’s reintroduction to the world — allowing him the rare opportunity to determine and define who and what we see.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original-series treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2010. (Both the “Finding…” series and the “Finding Allen Iverson” installment are registered with the WGA West, Inc.)

Finding Stephon Marbury

Finding Stephon Marbury Cover

In recent decades, as the popularity of basketball has grown and spread throughout the world, many stand-out players from the United States have traveled overseas and enjoyed long and productive careers as professional athletes. Of this ever-growing pool of talents, a select few have been former players in the National Basketball Association (NBA). Fewer have been NBA players of note.  And fewer still have been as prominent as Stephon Marbury.

Long among the NBA’s most elite players and scintillating talents, Marbury found his stock decline after of series of very public controversies led many in both the league and the media to question his judgment, his professionalism, and his commitment to team play. And at the end of the 2009 season, Marbury, 32, a thirteen-year veteran and two-time All-Star, found himself unsigned and uncertain of his future as a professional athlete and public figure.

That changed a short time later when Marbury joined the Shanxi Zhongyu Brave Dragons of the Chinese Basketball Association (CBA), and quickly established himself as one of the league’s premier players — earning MVP honors in the CBA’s All-Star Game, inking a three-year extension, and securing a commitment from the Brave Dragons to help grow and promote his Starbury sneaker brand in mainland China.

As he embarks on what may prove to be the final leg of his athletic career, Marbury — a “streetwise” player and persona forged in the crucible of New York City’s public courts; a world-renowned athlete who has triumphed at the highest levels of amateur and professional competition — finds himself a stranger in a strange land, cast adrift from the fame and fortune of the NBA, and dreaming, some speculate, of someday returning.

What are Marbury’s plans for the near future? What are the key challenges he faces — how has he created a sense of normalcy — in a society so radically different from our own? What wisdom has he earned from his experiences? And what, if anything, does he want to share with the world?

“Finding Stephon Marbury” will explore those questions and serve as Marbury’s reintroduction to America, giving him the opportunity — perhaps for the first time in his adult life — to control the narrative that defines him.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original-series treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2010. (Both the “Finding…” series and the “Finding Stephon Marbury” installment are registered with the WGA West, Inc.)

 

Jean Quixoté: Wyclef’s Quest for the Haitian Presidency

Wyclef Jean


“Jean Quixoté…” is a documentary film/series that provides a sustained, behind-the-scenes glimpse into Haitian-born, Grammy Award®-winning musician Wyclef Jean’s improbable candidacy to become the President of Haiti — the 12th in the last 20 years.

Against the backdrop of the Haitian landscape, the program will follow Wyclef along the campaign trail – observing his most public and his most private moments, and tracing his evolution from world-renowned pop star and political novice to aspiring statesman and world leader.

Using archival film and photographic footage, narrative voice-over, excerpted news coverage and “talking-head” interviews with academics, journalists, relief workers and prominent Haitian leaders, the program will provide a summary of Haiti’s richly complex history — balancing that against a clear, unsentimental depiction of the nation’s contemporary struggles both before and after the January earthquake.

Through interviews and impromptu Q&As with Wyclef, as well as with elected leaders and commentators from other nations in the region (including the US), the program will seek to capture greater insights into Wyclef’s motivations for running, his fears and anxieties regarding the undertaking (particularly in light of the violence and instability that have historically plagued the office), his vision for the nation, and his preparedness for the enormous — and unpredictable — challenges he would face as President.

In witnessing his reception among Haitian citizens and members of Haiti’s Establishment, exploring the opinions of supporters and detractors (including his challengers), capturing the struggles, triumphs, frustrations and defeats that await him and his campaign, the program will document Wyclef’s “performance” as a political candidate — charting where and when the music stops.


This concept summary is excerpted from an original treatment conceived, written and designed by me in 2010. (“Jean Quixoté” is registered with the WGA East, Inc.)

Readying the Renaissance: The Birth of the Urbanworld Film Festival

Urbanworld

Stacy Spikes, founder of the Urbanworld Film Festival, and Chairman Emeritus of Urbanworld Film Group — a multi-faceted cinematic enterprise spanning the festival, a film production company, an international distribution company, and a non-for-profit, film-preservation foundation — speaks to creative.destruction about the entrepreneurial value of faith, bravery, and surprisingly enough, failure.


CREATIVE.RECONSTRUCTION: Let’s begin by assuming that the readership is unfamiliar with Urbanworld. Can you briefly describe what it is and what it is that you do?

STACY SPIKES: Urbanworld is the largest minority film festival in the US. It’s both a non-for-profit and a for-profit enterprise: the non-for-profit is focused on increasing [film-making] opportunities for people of color, focused on the [filmed] works of people of color, and focused on helping people of color remain a part of, and increase our involvement in the contemporary cultural landscape; the for-profit is a distribution company that’s driven by the same mission, but more as a business — one trying to find commercial avenues to achieve our goals. The driving idea was: Instead of waiting for others to do it, why not just do it yourself.

Do you recall what the initial investment was? What, by way of capital, did you initially raise?

Zero. Basically, for the first five years there was no outside investment; anything that happened came out of my pocket. The Sony [sponsorship] deal, netted us $2.5M dollars. Soon after that, Black Enterprise came in with another $2.5M dollars. But the company was born right before 9/11 and we couldn’t continue to raise the capital we needed. Immediately after 9/11, you had to be a cash-flow positive company. People weren’t putting money into start-ups anymore. The Internet bubble had burst, and the Wall Street bubble burst at the same time. So we kind of put that on ice, we released four films, and then when the landscape righted itself, we got back to the festival.

Do you feel comfortable discussing revenue numbers?

The festival itself ranges roughly from $300K­–$1.2M; that’s about the range.

And what are some of the factors that determine those returns?

…Multiple events. If we do quarterly events, we can get into the higher range. So we can do the film festival, the college tour, a film series and lecture series, a traveling version of the festival; it creates many more opportunities to create income. And largely the money is made from underwriters and sponsors — that’s the number one revenue source. Ticket sales, merchandising, etc., they’re a distant second.

When did you decide, or realize, that it would be valuable to Urbanworld to diversify and form the Group?

We saw that there were no urban distributors. The festival was a means of saying to the market “Hey, aren’t these movies great?! You guys should put them out!” But they didn’t get put out. So we decided that we should do it, instead of waiting for Hollywood to catch on and do it.

Why do you think the industry seems to be so resistant to releasing urban-themed films?

One part is the myth that there is no foreign market [for those films]. If you think of [potential returns] as a whole pie, and you take half the pie away, I’m half as interested. It’s also important to realize that publicly traded companies have a job to drive stock price. Hollywood appreciates money just like everybody else, but it’s often more dimensional than that; it’s also about the time and effort invested. When you’re an independent, private company, you really get all of your bread and butter out of the US and you’re not as concerned with foreign sales. You can live and die in America. If you’re a publicly traded company that focuses on your stock price, you’re almost driven by hype more than anything else. So what are you gonna do? You’re going to release the “Matrix” trilogy, the “Harry Potter” movies, “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy, because they raise studio awareness and generate international sales. You don’t care as much about nurturing marginal or unheard stories — grassroots initiatives. With the “tentpole” events, you can literally make money before film is even screened. You can decide to make a billion-dollar trilogy and pre-sell it before it’s even done. Niche-focused ethnic films don’t interest anybody, or rather, they don’t interest everybody. Big movies with ensemble casts, however, can and do attract everybody. Building an entire community project — malls, schools, etc. — is less risky and proportionally less expensive than providing loans to build individual houses.

But that being said, there still seem to be many niche-focused independent films being made that have little or no legitimate chance of becoming blockbuster ventures. Where’s the disconnect there?

That’s the benefit of knowing — or being — mom’s dad’s uncle’s friend. It’s the trickle-down effect. Most communities don’t have that kind of money or that kind of risk tolerance. It’s not that others aren’t innovative and don’t finance movies via credit cards, etc., but….

You mentioned that, in part, the film festival was inspired by the fact that previously there was nothing like it. Would you say that there was also a pro-social inspiration as well? Were you mindful of the possibility that building the festival might inspire others to make films?

I think the [filmmaking and film-going inspiration] was already there, and the business model came second. When you’re at the festival and you see thousands of patrons come out to see these — and their — movies, those same people will by tickets at the movie theaters or buy the DVD. It’s important to grow where you’re planted. Become a hit in your own neighborhood, and then go on the road.

How was the idea initially perceived by the forces you approached, and by the industry at large?

The festival was helped a lot by timing. The idea was floated at precisely the right time; it was almost easy.

Your “insider” status helped, presumably. Stacy-Spikes-HiRes1

[Nods] Here I was the Vice President of Marketing at Miramax, doing business with all the brands and resources that I called upon to become part of the initiative. I can’t minimize that at all; it gave the festival an automatic leg up. Whereas many people started their festivals out of passion, but they weren’t in the business, per se.

Remember, there were other “black” film festivals out there before ours, so the concept wasn’t new. But never before in the history of the industry were black films being made in that volume, so you had that effect. Then here’s Vibe [magazine], here’s BET, here’s the hip-hop movement that itself is moving into film, and all of those things come together at the same moment in time — and there’s Urbanworld. We were just standing there.

What are the capital outlays required to mount the festival?

We never give those numbers out, but roughly several-hundred-thousand dollars a festival. Not quite a million dollars, but in the high hundred thousands. …

Can we backtrack a bit? Can you talk a little about your career trajectory?

I was supposed to go to Grambling University, like both of my parents. And I said to my mother and father “I want to take off the summer, travel, and move out to LA and just try it.” My father said “How much money do you have in your pocket?” I said “300 bucks.” He said “Well good; that’s all you’re getting, ‘cause I’m not financing it.” “You want to go to college — fine. But if you’re going to do this — you’re on your own.”

So I went out to LA [from Houston], with some friends. I get out there and — this is the shorter version, because I kind of floated around for a while — Berry Gordy had just sold Motown to Universal, and so Motown got moved to Los Angeles. They were in the process of staffing up, and they needed everything. I got a job in the art department, as a gopher. A position opened for something called a “product manager.” So I walked into the president’s office and told him that I wanted to try out the job. He said “well, I’ll give you a shot, but we’re going to fill your current position in the interim. So if you fail, you’re out.” “I’m gonna give you a group and let you start on them, and we’ll see what happens.” The group was Boyz II Men….

I then proceeded to do soundtracks for “Do The Right Thing,” and for “Jungle Fever.” Eddie Murphy joined the label after we did “Boomerang.” And then we ended up breaking Elvis Presley’s record by lasting 52 weeks at Number 1 with the [Boyz II Men] song “End of the Road.” So soon enough I had Stevie Wonder, Boyz II Men, Spike Lee, Eddie Murphy. Queen Latifah joined the label. I helped her win a Grammy for “Queen.” And I was all of 21 years old! Needless to say, I never made it to Grambling.

I then went to Sony and did “Bad Boys” with Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, and a bunch of other films like [Robert Altman’s] “Pret-a-Porter.”  Miramax then called me up and said that they wanted me to be their Vice President of Marketing. I said “…of music?” They said “…of everything.” They give me a script and they tell me that they want an answer in 24 hours. That script was “Scream.” I did “Scream”; I did “The Crow”; I did “Trainspotting,” and “Don’t Be A Menace in South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the ‘Hood.”

At around that time, October Films was getting off the ground, and I jumped over there to become Head of Publicity. Miramax’s marketing department had a very high turnover rate. In marketing, you can’t really win: if the movie’s a success, it’s because production made a good movie. But if the movie’s a failure, it’s your fault. Unfair, considering how essential marketing is to entertainment, but there it is.

Talk a bit about the obstacles you encountered in mounting the festival and growing the Urbanworld enterprise.

The biggest challenge is the courtship of sponsors every year. Some sponsors return, but by and large we have to sell our usefulness to a new sponsor pool each year. Also, our ups and downs and effected by the kinds of films being made, so when a “Collateral” comes out — great! But there really wasn’t much in the way of urban content produced this year. We tried to get “Miami Vice,” but the film wasn’t finished in time.

Why do you think sponsor relationships are so difficult to sustain?

The sponsors are driven by pressures to maximize quarterly returns. They’re often publicly traded companies and they have limited budgets for these kinds of initiatives. Frankly, giving money to an organization that helps rebuild inner city schools, or alleviates some grave disease, is going register a bit more than supporting an organization that seeks to promote film-making. The chosen initiatives change all the time.

How long did it take you to assemble the early festival-production team?

Not long. It was just a few phone calls and the gathering of interns. I put the money down for the theater — $300, interestingly enough. Urbanworld 1 screened 30 films. But this is the best story: On opening night we’re supposed to debut Bill Duke’s film “Hoodlum.” At the last minute, Bill [Duke] can’t come, Andy Garcia’s [who stars in the film] wife got sick, Laurence Fishburne is otherwise engaged, it’s raining. So I’m in the back of the cab en route to the theater, thinking to myself “this is a disaster.” Here I am $20K in the hole, all told, and I’m on the verge of losing it all.

So the screening is scheduled at the [now defunct] Gotham Theatre, and I tell the cabbie “drive around the block.” My plan was to sneak in through the back. I didn’t even want to walk through the front door. As we drive by, I see a few people standing outside the theater waiting to go in — in a torrential downpour, remember. We turn the corner and there’s a line snaking all the way down the block!

Closing night was “Soul Food” [Kenneth “Babyface” and Tracey Edmonds’s first feature film],  and they brought it to the theater on the plane! We hadn’t seen it; it didn’t even have final credits on it! The cast turned out — Vivica Fox, Mekhi Phifer, Babyface Edmonds; it was at the [now defunct] single-screen Radio City Theater — and it was madness! Sold-out show, packed to the rafters.

The New York Times ran a major article on the festival calling it “‘an idea whose time had come.’” We’ve essentially been chasing the magic of that first year ever since. The same forces that gave me that job at Motown, the same forces that took me to Columbia, the same forces that would let a twenty-something-year-old black exec exist at Miramax — and they had just released “Pulp Fiction,” which at the time was the hottest film on the planet — came together to validate the festival. None of that was me. I was — and am —just a tool for the universe to do its bidding.

Would you have described yourself as a spiritual person prior to that?

Absolutely. Faith is more important in business than anything. Faith and prayer — traditional and/or nontraditional prayer. You have to believe the impossible. There’s that saying “God can do the impossible, but that’s all he’s willing to do because the rest is up to you.” So anything on Earth that is humanly possible, it’s almost as of you have to run and leap and know the branch is going to be there. And in reality, you never fail, it just may take a little longer than you think. And that’s really the truth. Even with Urbanworld Films — we got a major distribution company to back us with no experience and track record. How did that happen? It’s impossible. But the meeting we had with the Sony exec’s was really telling. They were all sitting there, stone faced, and it really wasn’t going anywhere. So I said: “Let me show you the future.” I pulled out a DVD of 20-minute film, shot on a Sony DV cam for $500. “Kids are gonna make their own films, they’ll edit them on their home computers and they’ll build websites to promote them.” The movie comes on, the execs lean in, begin talking among each other, and they say “We want to do business with you.”

Conrad Hilton’s book “Be My Guest,” is an excellent primer on the connection between business and spirituality; it makes you think about things in an entire different light. Did Alexander Graham Bell create the phone or did the phone create Alexander Graham Bell? You need these people to be in a given place at a given moment for these things to happen. [Henry] Ford created four companies that failed before he found success with the Model-T. It’s almost as if these spirits need to be crushed into dust and reinvent themselves in order to succeed. Very, very, very few people succeed on their first try; it’s the missteps that help you find direction.

What’s the ideal exit strategy for you and Urbanworld?

I don’t know that there is one at the moment. We have discussed the possibility of selling it to a very strong player that may want to acquire it and provide it with greater year-round infrastructure. We look at the revenues that a Sundance or a Tribeca produce, and it underscores the importance of influencing the content output in Hollywood, because that affects the fortunes of the festival community.

If I had a dream goal for Urbanworld, it would be for it to resemble what they’ve done with the Joffrey Ballet: an environment wherein films are screened, where the craft of filmmaking is taught, and future of urban film is, at least on a creative level, secured.

We field tons of suggestions, proposals and inducements to show more films, go on the road, branch out into new media. But It’s important that we don’t overextend ourselves and sacrifice our core. Our mission is a bit different from that of the conventional film festival. There are certain kinds of films we pride ourselves on screening, distributing and supporting. That’s our crowning jewel; that’s the heart of Urbanworld.


This article was originally published in a fall 2008 edition of “The Opportunity” — the newspaper of the NYU Stern School of Business.